How CritFrame uses AI

CritFrame’s articles are written with AI tools. This page explains how.

How an article is made

• Sources: we follow official and primary sources — publisher and platform newsrooms, press releases and company filings.
• Drafting: articles are drafted by AI systems from those sources.
• Automated checks: before publication, every article goes through automated checks for sourcing (an official primary source is required and every link must work), originality (publication is blocked if 12 or more consecutive words match a source outside quotation marks, or if more than 20% of the article overlaps with a source), conflict of interest, and the rules in our editorial policy, such as labels for rumors and sponsored content.
• Editorial review: every article is reviewed against CritFrame’s published standards and approved by the CritFrame Editorial Desk before it is published.
• Human review: articles are not reviewed by a person before publication unless they are marked “Reviewed by an editor”.
• Sources cited: every source is linked in the article’s Sources box.
• Translation: English and Korean editions are adapted with AI tools, using official titles and local prices where they exist.

Every article ends with a line saying it was written with AI tools, linking to this page. Accountability for CritFrame lies with its operator, CritFrame Media.

What we don’t use AI for

• We don’t invent quotes, sources or events.
• We don’t publish our own game reviews or scores — our Review Roundups summarise other outlets’ published verdicts, with links.
• We never use AI-generated images that depict real games, real people or real products. We prefer official press images with credit, and otherwise use abstract placeholder graphics.
• We don’t publish rumors without the sourcing our editorial policy requires.

Corrections

If something is wrong, tell us. We fix errors openly under our corrections policy.